Dept Exclusion of Dribble Bar an ‘Own Goal’ – IFA

IFA National Rural Development Chair John Curran has called upon the Minister for Agriculture to revisit the decision to exclude the Dribble Bar from the TAMS 3 scheme. 

These comments were made by Mr. Curran after the Minister announced that aid for the Dribble Bar would not be granted under TAMS 3. 

“We have been looking for the Dribble Bar to be reinstated as an eligible investment item under TAMS 3 since before it was launched. It was there in TAMS 2, and was very popular among farmers,” John Curran said.

“We all know the ammonia and emissions challenges we face as a sector, so not having the full complement of technologies grant-aided under TAMS 3 is baffling. The trailing shoe just isn’t suitable for all farms, most especially those on heavy or hilly farms.”

“It’s an own-goal not having the Dribble Bar and others such as the Moscha swivel spout grant-aided. We need to be offering more and a range of innovative options here, not restricting them,” he said.

The Dribble Bar is a piece of equipment used to spread manure on fields which mitigates splash and reduces the surface area over which the slurry is spread by placing the slurry in lines along the field instead of spreading a layer over the grass. 

“Many lower stocked and smaller-scale farms will need to use LESS from January 1st, yet the Department is grant-aiding the Trailing Shoe only, discounting the dribble bar and the 30% reduction in emissions it brings relative to the traditional splash-plate.”

“The dribble bar costs less, suits more farmers, and is safer for many, while also delivering emission reductions, so the decision to omit it is illogical and Minister McConalogue must review this decision,” he added.

“Otherwise, the Minister and his Department officials need to come to the table with other forms of grant-aid support for the smaller scaled or upland farmer. What they have at the minute simply isn’t fit for purpose. It’s cost-prohibitive. Being forced to rely on agricultural contractors isn’t a sustainable solution either, for either party,” he said.  

The IFA National Rural Development Chair concluded his statement by emphasising the updates needed for the TAMS scheme to work smoothly saying: 

“Given the time constraints and the need to preserve and improve water quality, eligible investments aside, the whole TAMS process surrounding nutrient management applications needs to be expedited. Applications should be exempt from any rank or selection, and reference costs and ceilings must be updated to better account for inflationary pressures,”.